Publication Ethics Statement
The Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Research (JPRR) is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in academic publishing. Our ethics statement is guided by the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).
Core Ethical Principles
- Integrity: Research must be conducted and reported honestly and transparently.
- Accountability: Authors, editors, and reviewers must take responsibility for their roles in the publishing process.
- Fairness: All manuscripts are evaluated solely on scientific merit without discrimination.
- Transparency: Disclosure of funding, conflicts of interest, and research approvals is mandatory.
Responsibilities of Authors
- Submit only original and unpublished manuscripts.
- Provide accurate data and analysis, avoiding fabrication or falsification.
- Ensure all authors meet authorship criteria and approve the final manuscript.
- Acknowledge sources properly and avoid plagiarism or redundant publication.
- Disclose conflicts of interest and funding sources.
Responsibilities of Editors
- Ensure fair and unbiased review of manuscripts.
- Protect confidentiality of submissions and reviewer identities.
- Act swiftly in response to suspected ethical breaches.
- Adhere to COPE guidelines in handling corrections, retractions, and complaints.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
- Provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations.
- Maintain confidentiality of manuscripts and not use data for personal gain.
- Declare conflicts of interest before accepting review invitations.
- Report suspected plagiarism, duplication, or ethical concerns.
Research Involving Humans and Animals
Studies involving human participants must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and include documented informed consent. Research involving animals must adhere to institutional and international guidelines for animal welfare.
Plagiarism and Misconduct
JPRR employs plagiarism detection tools to identify overlapping or copied content. Any form of plagiarism, data fabrication, or duplicate publication is considered misconduct and may result in rejection, retraction, or institutional notification.
Data Sharing and Transparency
Authors are encouraged to share datasets and materials used in their research to promote transparency, reproducibility, and trust in published findings.
Handling Complaints and Appeals
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing detailed justification. Complaints regarding peer review or ethical concerns are handled according to COPE’s flowcharts and best practices.
Corrections and Retractions
If significant errors or misconduct are identified after publication:
- Corrections are published for honest errors.
- Retractions are issued for invalid results or confirmed misconduct.
- Expressions of Concern are issued while investigations are ongoing.
Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion
JPRR values diversity in research and editorial practices. Submissions are evaluated without discrimination based on race, gender, geography, or institutional affiliation.
FAQs
What happens if misconduct is suspected?
All allegations are investigated thoroughly, with actions taken according to COPE guidelines.
Can authors publish elsewhere during review?
No. Simultaneous submission to multiple journals is considered unethical and may lead to rejection or sanctions.
How are conflicts of interest managed?
All conflicts must be disclosed. Editors ensure transparency and take steps to mitigate potential bias.
Conclusion
The Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Research (JPRR) is committed to ethical publishing practices that safeguard the credibility of the academic record and advance trustworthy scientific communication.