Editorial Policies | Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Research

The Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Research (JPRR) upholds the highest standards of editorial integrity and transparency. Our editorial policies are designed to ensure fairness, accountability, and adherence to internationally recognized guidelines, including those established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are made independently of the publisher, financial sponsors, or any external influence. The Editor-in-Chief, along with the editorial board, is solely responsible for the selection and acceptance of articles based on their scientific merit, originality, and relevance to the field of respiratory medicine.

Peer Review Policy

All manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process. Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise and impartiality. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other to minimize bias.

At least two independent reviewers evaluate each submission.
Review criteria include scientific validity, originality, clarity, and ethical standards.
Editorial decisions may result in acceptance, revision, or rejection.

Authorship Criteria

JPRR follows ICMJE recommendations for defining authorship. To qualify, an author must contribute significantly to:

Concept and design of the study.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data.
Drafting or critically revising the manuscript.
Final approval of the version to be published.

All authors must agree to be accountable for the integrity of the work. Ghostwriting and guest authorship are strictly prohibited.

Conflict of Interest Policy

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest—financial or non-financial—that could influence their work or judgment. Transparency ensures the credibility of published research.

Data Sharing and Transparency

JPRR encourages authors to share supporting data, codes, and methodologies wherever possible, fostering reproducibility and transparency in research.

Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit data sets in open repositories (e.g., Zenodo, Dryad) and include data availability statements within their manuscripts.

Plagiarism and Misconduct

All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software. Submissions with evidence of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, or unethical practices are rejected and may be reported to the author’s institution.

Corrections, Retractions, and Withdrawals

JPRR has clear procedures for corrections, retractions, and withdrawals. Corrections are issued for minor errors that do not affect the study’s validity. Retractions are published if major misconduct or errors invalidate findings.

Ethics in Research

Submissions involving human or animal subjects must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant institutional and national ethical guidelines. Ethics approval and informed consent must be explicitly stated.

Editorial Board Responsibilities

Ensure fair and unbiased peer review.
Maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
Promote research integrity and discourage unethical practices.
Foster diversity and inclusivity in editorial practices.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, provide constructive feedback, and respect the confidentiality of the review process. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed, and reviews must be submitted in a timely manner.

Open Access and Licensing Policy

All content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), allowing unrestricted distribution and reuse with proper attribution to authors.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing clear justifications. Complaints regarding editorial or ethical issues will be handled in accordance with COPE’s Core Practices.

FAQs

Can editors publish in JPRR?

Yes, but such submissions undergo independent peer review to avoid conflicts of interest.

How are disputes between authors and reviewers resolved?

The Editor-in-Chief mediates disputes by considering reviewer comments, author responses, and the overall scientific merit of the work.

What happens if misconduct is detected after publication?

The editorial office investigates promptly. If misconduct is confirmed, retraction or correction notices are issued, and institutions may be notified.

Conclusion

The Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Research (JPRR) is committed to maintaining the highest editorial standards, ensuring that published content is trustworthy, transparent, and aligned with global publishing ethics.