Abstract

Review Article

The Use of Machine Learning Decision Tree Algorithms in Phenotyping Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Based on Clinical, Radiological, and Biological Heterogeneity- A Review

Moumita Chakraborty*

Published: 08 July, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 2 | Pages: 026-030

Background: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a clinically, radiologically, and biologically heterogeneous condition. This variability contributes to diagnostic challenges and inconsistent responses to therapy. Identifying homogeneous subgroups or phenotypes within ARDS may enhance precision medicine and therapeutic targeting.
Objective: This review evaluates the utility of decision tree–based supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms—specifically CART, Random Forest, and AdaBoost—in phenotyping ARDS using clinical, radiological, and biological data.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted between December 2023 and March 2024 using PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms included ‘decision tree in ARDS’, ‘phenotype in ARDS’, and ‘ML in hypo- and hyperinflammatory ARDS’. Twenty-six relevant articles were included, comprising original studies and reviews.
Results: Decision tree–based models have demonstrated significant potential in classifying ARDS subtypes using routine clinical variables, radiographic features, and biomarker profiles. These algorithms have shown strong predictive performance in differentiating inflammatory phenotypes, forecasting mortality, and enabling early ARDS prediction.
Conclusion: Decision tree algorithms offer a promising approach to ARDS phenotyping by leveraging routinely available data. Their interpretability and predictive accuracy may aid in translating complex biological insights into bedside clinical decision-making, advancing personalized care in critical illness.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jprr.1001070 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

References

  1. Bos LDJ, Ware LB. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: causes, pathophysiology, and phenotypes. Lancet. 2022;400(10358):1145-1156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01485-4
  2. Fernando SM, Ferreyro BL, Urner M, Munshi L, Fan E. Diagnosis and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. CMAJ. 2021;193(21):E761-E768. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202661
  3. Bai Y, Xia J, Huang X, Chen S, Zhan Q. Using machine learning for the early prediction of sepsis-associated ARDS in the ICU and identification of clinical phenotypes with differential responses to treatment. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1050849. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1050849
  4. Matthay MA, Thompson BT, Ware LB. The Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: Should patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen be included? Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(8):933-936. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00105-3
  5. Yuan X, Pan C, Xie J, Qiu H, Liu L. An expanded definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: Challenging the status quo. J Intensive Med. 2023;3(1):62-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.06.002
  6. Sayed M, Riaño D, Villar J. Novel criteria to classify ARDS severity using a machine learning approach. Crit Care. 2021;25:150. Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-021-03566-w
  7. Villar J, Pérez-Méndez L, Kacmarek RM. The Berlin definition met our needs: no. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:648–650. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-016-4242-6
  8. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0291
  9. Bellani G, Pham T, Laffey JG. Missed or delayed diagnosis of ARDS: a common and serious problem. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1180-1183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06035-0
  10. Le S, Pellegrini E, Green-Saxena A, Summers C, Hoffman J, Calvert J, et al. Supervised machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). J Crit Care. 2020;60:96-102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.019
  11. ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.5669
  12. McNicholas BA, Rooney GM, Laffey JG. Lessons to learn from epidemiologic studies in ARDS. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24:41–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0000000000000473
  13. Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Ware LB. Clinical trials in acute respiratory distress syndrome: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(6):524–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30188-1
  14. Reilly JP, Calfee CS, Christie JD. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40(1):19-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1684049
  15. Ruan SY, Huang CT, Chien YC, Kuo LC, et al. Etiology-associated heterogeneity in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:183. Available from: https://bmcpulmmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12890-021-01557-9
  16. Wilson JG, Calfee CS. ARDS Subphenotypes: Understanding a Heterogeneous Syndrome. Crit Care. 2020;24:102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2778-x
  17. Thille AW, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, Rodriguez JM, Aramburu JA, Peñuelas O, et al. Comparison of the Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(7):761–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201211-1981oc
  18. Alipanah N, Calfee CS. Phenotyping in acute respiratory distress syndrome: state of the art and clinical implications. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022;28(1):1-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0000000000000903
  19. Schwager E, Jansson K, Rahman A, Schiffer S, Chang Y, Boverman G, et al. Utilizing machine learning to improve clinical trial design for acute respiratory distress syndrome. npj Digit Med. 2021;4:133. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00505-5
  20. Bohr A, Memarzadeh K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. 2020:25–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2
  21. Sarke IH. Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions. SN Computer Science. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x
  22. Ding XF, Li JB, Liang HY, Wang ZY, Jiao TT, Liu Z, et al. Predictive model for acute respiratory distress syndrome events in ICU patients in China using machine learning algorithms: a secondary analysis of a cohort study. J Transl Med. 2019;17:326. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-2075-0
  23. Sinha P, Churpek MM, Calfee CS. Machine learning classifier models can identify acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes using readily available clinical data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:996–1004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202002-0347oc
  24. Oo AN, Naing T. Decision Tree Models for Medical Diagnosis. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development. 2019 Apr;3(3):1697-1699. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/decision-tree-models-for-medical-diagnosis/151269112
  25. Azar AT, El-Metwally SM. Decision tree classifiers for automated medical diagnosis. Neural Comput & Applic. 2013;23:2387–2403. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-012-1196-7
  26. Calfee CS, Delucchi KL, Sinha P, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(9):691-698. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(18)30177-2/abstract
  27. Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA, et al. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(8):611–620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70097-9
  28. Sinha P, Churpek MM, Calfee CS. Machine Learning Classifier Models Can Identify Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes Using Readily Available Clinical Data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(7):996-1004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202002-0347oc
  29. Le S, Pellegrini E, Green-Saxena A, Summers C, Hoffman J, Calvert J, Das R. Supervised machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). J Crit Care. 2020;60:96-102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.019
  30. Yang P, Wu T, Yu M, Chen F, Wang C, Yuan J, et al. A new method for identifying the acute respiratory distress syndrome disease based on noninvasive physiological parameters. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0226962. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226962
  31. Bai Y, Xia J, Huang X, Chen S, Zhan Q. Using machine learning for the early prediction of sepsis-associated ARDS in the ICU and identification of clinical phenotypes with differential responses to treatment. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1050849. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1050849
  32. Ling J, Liu H, Yu D, Wang Z, Fang M. Three subtypes of postoperative ARDS that showing different outcomes and responses to mechanical ventilation and fluid management: A machine learning and latent profile analysis. Heart Lung. 2023;62:135-144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.07.007
  33. Puybasset L, Cluzel P, Gusman P, Grenier P, Preteux F, Rouby JJ; CT Scan ARDS Study Group. Regional distribution of gas and tissue in acute respiratory distress syndrome. I. Consequences for lung morphology. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(07):857-869. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340051274
  34. Mrozek S, Jabaudon M, Jaber S, Paugam-Burtz C, Lefrant JY, Rouby JJ, et al; Azurea network. Elevated plasma levels of sRAGE are associated with nonfocal CT-based lung imaging in patients with ARDS: a prospective multicenter study. Chest. 2016;150(05):998-1007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.016
  35. Liu X, Jiang Y, Jia X, Ma X, Han C, Guo N, et al. Identification of distinct clinical phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome with differential responses to treatment. Crit Care. 2021;25:320. Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-021-03734-y
  36. Ruan SY, Huang CT, Chien YC, Huang CK, Chien JY, Kuo LC, et al. Etiology-associated heterogeneity in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01557-9
  37. Sinha P, Delucchi KL, McAuley DF, O'Kane CM, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Development and validation of parsimonious algorithms to classify acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes: a secondary analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(3):247-257. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30369-8
  38. Kent DM, Steyerberg E, van Klaveren D. Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects. BMJ. 2018;363:k4245. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4245
  39. Singhal L, Garg Y, Yang P, Tabaie A, Wong AI, Mohammed A, et al. eARDS: A multi-center validation of an interpretable machine learning algorithm of early onset Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) among critically ill adults with COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257056. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257056
  40. Le S, Pellegrini E, Green-Saxena A, Summers C, Hoffman J, Calvert J, Das R. Supervised machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). J Crit Care. 2020;60:96-102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.019
  41. Podgorelec V, Kokol P, Stiglic B, Rozman I. Decision Trees: An Overview and Their Use in Medicine. J Med Syst. 2002;26:445–463. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016409317640
  42. Chang W, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Yuan X, Xu X, Zhang S, Zhou S. A Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Method for Hypertension Outcomes Based on Medical Data. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019;9(4):178. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040178
  43. Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1986;1:81–106. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00116251
  44. Bos LDJ, Artigas A, Constantin JM, Hagens LA, Heijnen N, Laffey JG, et al. Precision medicine in acute respiratory distress syndrome: workshop report and recommendations for future research. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(159):200317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0317-2020
  45. Pennati F, Aliverti A, Pozzi T, Gattarello S, Lombardo F, Coppola S, et al. Machine learning predicts lung recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome using single lung CT scan. Ann Intensive Care. 2023;13:60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01154-5

Figures:

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?